Monday, September 12, 2016

Prince George and Princess Charlotte to accompany royals on tour of Canada


Is this a noteworthy event? Well, is it!?! I don't know. Being interested (or uninterested) in royals seems entirely arbitrary. Really, they are just someone else's family and they're rich. But not so rich that it is obscene and therefore worth rubbernecking. They are an old family with old homes and traditions and such. However, imho the best that could be said about them is that they let go of power and kept all their stuff. However, considering the personal hazard which comes with being a celebrity in the modern era maybe that wasn't such a good idea.

We live in an era with a lot of problems but it is likely that people living in every era have thought the same. Do wolves have an existential crisis when it becomes difficult to catch deer? Do they blame other wolves for catching too many deer? Do they research how much protein they could obtain by eating insects instead? Wolves survive or don't without much hand-wringing, which from my vantage point seems wonderfully simpler.

I think it is to our detriment that power must disguise it's raw brutality. Democracy was created to put checks on power and confront its arbitrariness but it really just pushed it out of sight. Now we have a system where the powerful spend a lot of effort ensuring lies are truths because no matter what, they're going to get what they want. What else do you do with power?

It is disconcerting living in this time of radical changes in communication. The world of the 20th century was one where power could much more efficiently control what ideas were mainstream. When you owned newspapers and tv and therefore had a say about who got promoted in those industries it was your prerogative. Now, with the internet, a lot more ideas are on the table. For better and for worse.

This shows the inherent weakness in power. For all their think-tanks they weren't able to foresee what the unintended consequences of the technological revolution would be. The publicly funded US defence department developed the internet to prevent an attack at one location from disabling their entire nuclear arsenal. The most important design goal was robustness. This technology was transferred to the private domain for business to profit from (well played power) and led to our internet of today which is difficult to control (oops!) Technically, it would have been possible to create an internet which fit nicely into our existing top-down, hierarchical media model if that had been the goal from the beginning, sadly the cat's out of the bag.

This hasn't improved the lot of most people because power has simply shifted to the new mandarins; apple, google, facebook. But we can be assured that these organizations will also, eventually, fail to read the tea leaves correctly and fall from their lofty towers. And when they do, I'm sure we won't be interested in the fact that their descendants are visiting Canada. So bravo royals, way to maintain the ability to go nowhere without everyone looking and pointing.

No comments: